|
New National Unity The "New National Unity" is a White-Nationalist organisation from the Netherlands. In the English section we have published some translations of articles found on this website. International Capitalism The Capitalist economical system knows a "unbounded" principal. It subordinates the rights of humans, animals and Nations to the market forces. Capitalism sees the Nation/Volk as nothing less as a pile of rescourses on the same spot. When there's a shortage of human labour in a region, country or continent, Capitalism thinks it's easy to fix, by getting Workforce from far regions and place them between the authentic people. As a result of this there's a braindrain in the region the workforce is extracted from. Another effect is the damage towards the independence and ethnic construction of the authentic people/nation who live in the other region. By placing strange ethnicities in regions where originally lives another people/Volk, Capitalism creates ethnic tensions and untenable situations. Divers Ethnic problems are a direct result of the Capitalist society. If the goverments in the sixties didn't had the need to open up the borders for immigrant workers, the Ethnic problems wouldn't be as great as today. Even nowadays the offspring of immigrant workers, are completely unrooted and out of place, and have no understanding of their own identity. Unrooted and out of place population groups are a great danger to society. Compare the third generation offspring of immigrant workers with the original foreign worker. The ammount of inconvieniance they produce is many times greater then the authentic immigrant workers produced, even though the authentic ones were less integrated. Market force Through market force small businesses and craft trades are driven into a corner. Regional bound products and local dishes are replaced by cheap mass production and fast food. The middle class, wich is opressed by the vast international capital, is ussually a more stable factor for the economy as a multi national. The middle class is more bound to a region, instead of a multi national, which easily moves it's production to another region, if that is more convenient for them. The small business is also a more stable employer than a big company. The middle class has smaller differences in sales and benefit prognosis, instead of large companies which have to rely upon vast orders. Liberalism Capitalism came forth out of the Liberal political idiology. The Liberal idiology is anti Nationalism. Liberalism and Capitalism replace the rights of Nations to goverment theirselves by individual rights which inevitable lead to dissipation and egoism. Given that liberalism and capitalism are two and the same, the National-Liberal idiology is also a sort of contradictio in terminius. Globalism Globalism devotes itself to global values which aren't bound to specific regions: "one world, one culture'. Nowadays regional and national goverments are subordinated by international organisations and authorities like the Nato, G8, NWO, IMF and EU. Regional and national habits and traditions are made inferior and are subordinated to the international interests of the Capitalist system. Based on: Blickpunkt Lausitz "Antikapitalizmus von rechts" Source: Free translation of an article of the New National Unity (NNE) Netherlands NationalismSome opinions which where accepted in recent history, are nowadays denounced by our present politicians. And the people who have these different opinions are criminalised in many ways. One of these opinions which has become in discredit is that of Nationalism. That's a weird matter, because healthy Nationalism is a very positive force within a society. Whitout Nationalism the Netherlands could't excist, and whitout Nationalism the entire concept of constitutional state and welfare state couldn't excist. Non the less most of the people see Nationalism as a dangerous, agressive theory. But what's Nationalism? Is it as evil as the mass media tries to make us believe? Historically Nationalism came into excistance at the end of the 18th century, with the conservative revolution, as a reaction to the old feudaal society. In Germany it was the leading force against all the small feudaal principalities Germany was made of. As an ideology it was the fundament on wich the German unity state was formed, which was finally declared in 1870. In those days Nationalism was a Progressive force. They put the accent at visions as Volk, unity and harmony, and tore down the feudaal society. Also they resisted against all kinds of imperialistic tendencies. Italian Nationalist fought a battle for their freedom against foreign occupants, in that time the Austrians under the emperial dynasty of Habsburg. This became the Italian unity state we know even till today. What's a definition of Nationalism? Nationalism puts the accent on the idea that people of the same Volk, which they are naturally connected with, live in the same country. Nationalism searches for the common values between people. In that sense Nationalism connects people. Nationalism defines nation as: "A group of people, a cultural and uniform group, with their own language, which is marked in a sense of harmony. Within the idea of a nation, harmony is most important. There's a common willingness to live in harmony, under the same political conditions and laws. This sense of living in harmony and unity, is reinforced by a uniform history, origin, culture and common language. Nationalism thigtens the band between culture, Volk and country. Nationalism on it's own is not agressive, it grants every Volk it's place under the sun. Nationalism is not right- or leftwing, it only puts the accent on harmony between the entire Volk, no matter under what kind of political system. It's clear the idea of Nationalism turns against the multi cultural society. Where Nationalism puts the accent on natural unity, multi culturalism puts the accent on diversity. That's why multi culturism is the natural opposite of Nationalism. That's the reason why the left wing elite has so much hate against todays Nationalists. Because Nationalism says what all people instinctively feel: more cultures mixed can't go right. Because political party's in the Netherlands which propagate Nationalist views are completely criminalised by the present Left wing and Liberal elite, our country goes down under the horrible results of a multi cultural society. Whites can't express themselves, and can only flee from the big cities to suburban towns and villages, to flee from the multi cultural chaos. This behaviour let us see, that Nationalism, despite it's fully in the defensive these days, still has a great support under the white Dutch people. E.D.H Source: free translation of an article of the New National Unity (NNE) Netherlands Racial DoctrineAnimals adapt fysical to their enviroment, humans change their enviroment and create cultures. With humans the phenomenon race is closely related to the phenomenon culture. If we look at the rise and downfall of civilisations as an organic action, we'll see that a period of growth and beauty unavoidable is releaved by a generation of decline and decay. A civilisation is born and centuries later dies from a natural cause, after which a new culture comes to life. The current races are -in their regular means- fossiles or fixed civilisations from long gone times, and form a sort of resistance too which the modern man can develop itself. An aspect of this is the heredity line, expressed in the bloodline. The core of the racial doctrine becomes more clear as we see it as two opposite evolutions, a rising and a decending evolution. The rising evolution is the humanizing and individualisation evolution. The decending evolution represents the materialisation and consolidation, making everything physical what originally was spirit and soul. As spititual acquirements in their contrary remain, when they become pure physical, man encounters in it's rising line more and more resistance of the decending line, which we have to conquer as an individual. In each individual man both evolutional lines come together, what we can see as two opposite turning wheels. The decending evolution does sometimes raid the rising evolution. The strife for racial purity on the other hand puts humanity back to judge from natural instincts. The leading principal is the bloodline and the terratorium. Also the hierarchical classification of man on basis of physical character, wich is legitimate in the animal kingdom, is transferred to the human kingdom. It's clear that Adolf Hitlers racial doctrines only can scientificly be understood again, if we see everything from a new biological image of man. Ignorence of an evolution in the sense of a moral development to socalled "freedom" and "love", leads to a society which spiritually can't resist against the natural racial doctrine, so they declare it taboo because of pure powerlesness. Instead of a clear individual judgement, they flee to moralism and the prohibition of an independent opinion. A small group of socalled intellectuals decides which kind of ideas we can and can't have as a "species". Source: Free translation of a article from the: New National Unity (NNE), Netherlands | | | The scourge of Marxism"Killing one man is murder, killing a million people is just a statistic" (Josef Stalin) A lot of people today still genuinely think that the equality they devote themselves too, is a blessing for humanity. Their promise of equality has always been a big failure in history: Communism betrayed them by installing the most murderous regimes in recent history: Capitalism has made a mockery of it, by making the most infamous economical and social unequality legitimate on grounds of a pure equality principal. Despite the fact these two are opposites of each other, Capitalism and Communism belong to the same category, which goes back to the enlightenment and the French revolution: the same individualisation at the basis, the same universal equality ideas, the same rationalism, the same primate of the factor economy, the same pounding on emancipation of labour, the same belief in progress and the same hope on the end of history. In many aspects Liberalism has only reached more of it's goals than the quite common Socialism: the extermination of group identities and traditional cultures, destroying the planet, and worldwide uniformisation of the production system and the consumer society. On the left side they are prepared to make such a radical break with the past for the ideal of the "new man", wich would be indefinitely workable by serious changing of his enviroment and getting rid of his identity. From their view the diversity in the world becomes an obstacle and everything that separates people is seen as something unforeseen, outdated or dangerous. When (neo) Marxism wasn't limited to just an idiology, but was actual executed, we see how she tried to get individuals out of their traditional specific communities by all means to subject them to a universal society. This utopia has formed itself to the worst totalitair construction of the 20th century. Man is naturally embedded in a indentity which is formed by many factors: as once in a lifetime being, he's the eternal commuter between the universal (his species) or the privately owned (each culture, each era). Cultures each have their own centre of gravity; different cultures give different answers to crucial questions. That's why every attempt to fuse them ends in their elimination. That's why multi culturalism is a dangerous mistake. Because of the fact they see equality as a primal cause to strife for, even though it's against the human nature (no two cultures or humans are the same in behaviour). This always leads to oppression. A century of Marxism led too: China: 52 million casualties Eastern Europe: 1 million Vietnam: 1 million Cambodja: 2 million Afghanistan: 2,5 million Africa: 1,7 million Latin-America: 150.000 Not ruling communist parties: 10 million Today's neo-Marxist Left wing activists are still reticent to judge the communist cruelty. The explanation for that is easy: they both share the same fundamental believe in human nature and the believe that the goverment should steer where necessary. Even till today the left wing supports the ideals of communism. It looks like the only people who've learned anything about the communist experiment are the people who where victim of that regime. Neo marxists call themselves anti-globalists against the capitalist new world order (wich they are), but they put their own globalisation in place, which is comparable destructive for Volk and culture. Source: Free translation of an artikel from the New National Unity (NNE) Netherlands | | | | | | | | |
|
|
